Which has the lower expense ratio, LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth or UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct?

LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's expense ratio is 0.21% versus UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct's 1.3%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth and UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct

Q: LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct — which has given better returns?

LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth has a 1-year return of 4.47% versus UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct's 3.35%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

LIC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Medium to Long Duration

UTI Medium to Long Duration Fund-Growth - Direct

UTI Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Medium to Long Duration

Metric	LIC MF Medium to Long ...	UTI Medium to Long Dur...
NAV	₹81.89	₹83.14
Star Rating	★★★★	★★
Expense Ratio	0.21%	1.3%
AUM	₹176 Cr	₹303 Cr
1M Return	+1.26%	+0.73%
3M Return	+2.4%	+1.93%
6M Return	+3.56%	+2.82%
1Y Return	+4.47%	+3.35%
3Y CAGR	+7.58%	+6.46%
5Y CAGR	+6.42%	+8.7%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Marzban Irani	Amandeep Chopra

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds