Which has the lower expense ratio, HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth or LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth?

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth's expense ratio is 0.63% versus LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's 0.22%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth and LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth vs LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Q: HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth vs LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth — which has given better returns?

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth has a 1-year return of 2.24% versus LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's 3.78%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth

HSBC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Medium to Long Duration

LIC MF Medium to Long Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

LIC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Medium to Long Duration

Metric	HSBC Medium to Long Du...	LIC MF Medium to Long ...
NAV	₹48.67	₹81.9
Star Rating	★★	★★★★
Expense Ratio	0.63%	0.22%
AUM	₹48 Cr	₹173 Cr
1M Return	-0.27%	-0.32%
3M Return	-0.64%	-0.4%
6M Return	+1.94%	+2.41%
1Y Return	+2.24%	+3.78%
3Y CAGR	+6.51%	+7.38%
5Y CAGR	+5.17%	+6.23%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Sanjay Shah	Marzban Irani

View Fund A View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds