HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth vs HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth — which has given better returns?

HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth has a 1-year return of 5.05% versus HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth's 5.82%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Which has the lower expense ratio, HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth or HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth?

HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth's expense ratio is 0.46% versus HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth's 0.4%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth and HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth vs HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

HDFC Low Duration Fund - Growth

HDFC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Income/Debt Oriented · Ultra Short to Short Term Fund

HSBC Low Duration Fund - Direct Growth

HSBC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Income/Debt Oriented · Ultra Short to Short Term Fund

Metric	HDFC Low Duration Fund...	HSBC Low Duration Fund...
NAV	₹61.95	₹32.77
Star Rating	★★★★	★★★
Expense Ratio	0.46%	0.4%
AUM	₹18,242 Cr	₹914 Cr
1M Return	+0.06%	+0.15%
3M Return	+0.82%	+1.07%
6M Return	+2.4%	+2.87%
1Y Return	+5.05%	+5.82%
3Y CAGR	+6.61%	+7.69%
5Y CAGR	+6.05%	+6.87%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Anupam Joshi	Jalpan Shah

View Fund A View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds