Which has the lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth or LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth?

Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth's expense ratio is 0.36% versus LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's 0.23%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth and LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth vs LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Q: Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth vs LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth — which has given better returns?

Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth has a 1-year return of 5.94% versus LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's 6.48%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

Edelweiss Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan Growth

Edelweiss Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Low Duration Fund

LIC MF Low Duration Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

LIC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Low Duration Fund

Metric	Edelweiss Low Duration...	LIC MF Low Duration Fu...
NAV	₹1094.86	₹45.83
Star Rating	★★★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	0.36%	0.23%
AUM	₹557 Cr	₹1,692 Cr
1M Return	+0.56%	+1.14%
3M Return	+1.62%	+2.11%
6M Return	+2.86%	+3.26%
1Y Return	+5.94%	+6.48%
3Y CAGR	—	+7.4%
5Y CAGR	—	+6.45%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Rahul Dedhia	Rahul Singh

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds