Nippon India Interval Fund-Quarterly Interval Fund Series-II-Growth Option vs Nippon India Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Bonus Option
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
Nippon India Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Bonus Option appears stronger based on its higher star rating of 5 and significantly better returns over 3 and 5 years, with CAGRs of 12.79% and 13.07%, respectively, compared to Nippon India Interval Fund-Quarterly Interval Fund Series-II-Growth Option, which has a star rating of 2 and lower CAGRs of 7.04% and 5.92%. However, the tradeoff is that the expense ratio for the Large Cap Fund is higher at 0.85%, compared to just 0.15% for the Interval Fund. For investors deciding between these two, the Large Cap Fund offers better performance but at a higher cost.
Nippon India Interval Fund-Quarterly Interval Fund Series-II-Growth Option
Nippon India Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Large Cap
Nippon India Large Cap Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Bonus Option
Nippon India Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Large Cap
| Metric | Nippon India Interval ... | Nippon India Large Cap... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹41.95 | ₹102.86 |
| Star Rating | ★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.85% |
| AUM | ₹3,461 Cr | ₹51,296 Cr |
| 1M Return | -0.34% | +6.99% |
| 3M Return | -5.22% | -0.11% |
| 6M Return | -4.67% | +1.67% |
| 1Y Return | -11.68% | -0.78% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.04% | +12.79% |
| 5Y CAGR | +5.92% | +13.07% |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Payal Kaipunjal | Ashwani Kumar, Sailesh Raj Bhan |