Which has the lower expense ratio, Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth or UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option?

Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth's expense ratio is 0.21% versus UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option's 0.14%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth and UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth vs UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Q: Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth vs UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option — which has given better returns?

Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth has a 1-year return of 36.75% versus UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option's 18.77%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth

Mirae Asset Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Commodities · Silver

UTI Dynamic Bond Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

UTI Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Commodities · Silver

Metric	Mirae Asset S&P 500 To...	UTI Dynamic Bond Fund ...
NAV	₹8.12	₹26.38
Star Rating	★★★★★	★★
Expense Ratio	0.21%	0.14%
AUM	₹37 Cr	₹634 Cr
1M Return	-17.1%	-8.06%
3M Return	-15.66%	-5.43%
6M Return	-24.11%	-16.14%
1Y Return	+36.75%	+18.77%
3Y CAGR	+46.62%	+41.38%
5Y CAGR	+26.9%	+7.48%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Ritesh Patel	Ayush Jain

View Fund A View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds