Which has the lower expense ratio, LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth or WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth?

LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth's expense ratio is 1.31% versus WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth's 0.86%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth and WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth vs WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth

Q: LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth vs WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth — which has given better returns?

LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth has a 1-year return of -7.98% versus WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth's -3.24%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Direct Plan-Growth

LIC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · ELSS

WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund Direct Plan Growth

WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · ELSS

Metric	LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-...	WhiteOak Capital ELSS ...
NAV	₹163.09	₹18.0
Star Rating	★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	1.31%	0.86%
AUM	₹972 Cr	₹481 Cr
1M Return	-3.83%	-5.98%
3M Return	-4.76%	-4.14%
6M Return	-2.1%	+0.41%
1Y Return	-7.98%	-3.24%
3Y CAGR	+8.34%	+14.22%
5Y CAGR	+7.57%	—
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Sachin Relekar	Shariq Merchant

View Fund A View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds