Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct vs UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option — which has given better returns?

Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct has a 1-year return of 24.5% versus UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option's 13.62%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Which has the lower expense ratio, Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct or UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option?

Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct's expense ratio is 0.1919% versus UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option's 0.07%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct and UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct vs UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

Kotak Gold Fund Growth - Direct

Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Commodities · Gold

UTI - GILT FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option

UTI Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Commodities · Gold

Metric	Kotak Gold Fund Growth...	UTI - GILT FUND - Dire...
NAV	₹14.59	₹27.87
Star Rating	★★★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	0.1919%	0.07%
AUM	₹1,141 Cr	₹1,515 Cr
1M Return	-3.71%	-4.36%
3M Return	+1.54%	+3.29%
6M Return	-4.33%	-3.06%
1Y Return	+24.5%	+13.62%
3Y CAGR	+35.13%	+34.48%
5Y CAGR	+24.46%	+5.41%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Abhishek Bisen	Ayush Jain

View Fund A View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds