ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund - Growth vs Kotak Business Cycle - Direct Plan - Growth
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
Kotak Business Cycle - Direct Plan - Growth appears stronger based on its impressive star rating of 5 and significantly better returns over the last year and three years, with a 1Y return of 6.73% and a 3Y CAGR of 17.77%. In contrast, ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund - Growth has a low star rating of 1 and negative returns over the same periods, with a 1Y return of -22.06% and a 3Y CAGR of -4.87%, although it does have a higher AUM of ₹1508 Cr compared to Kotak's ₹3413 Cr. The tradeoff for investors is that while Kotak offers better performance and a lower expense ratio of 0.7393%, ICICI's higher AUM may suggest greater market confidence in its management. For investors choosing between these funds, Kotak Business Cycle presents a more favorable risk-return profile.
ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund - Growth
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Thematic
Kotak Business Cycle - Direct Plan - Growth
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Thematic
| Metric | ICICI Prudential FMCG ... | Kotak Business Cycle -... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹419.64 | ₹18.71 |
| Star Rating | ★ | ★★★★★ |
| Expense Ratio | 1.67% | 0.7393% |
| AUM | ₹1,508 Cr | ₹3,413 Cr |
| 1M Return | -3.69% | +3.7% |
| 3M Return | -9.14% | +0.27% |
| 6M Return | -10.29% | +9.23% |
| 1Y Return | -22.06% | +6.73% |
| 3Y CAGR | -4.87% | +17.77% |
| 5Y CAGR | +3.15% | — |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Atul Patel | Pankaj Tibrewal |