ICICI Prudential Banking and PSU Debt Fund - Growth vs ITI Banking & PSU Debt Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
ICICI Prudential Banking and PSU Debt Fund appears stronger based on its higher returns across the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year periods, with returns of 4.91%, 7.1%, and 6.6% respectively, compared to ITI Banking & PSU Debt Fund's returns of 4.27%, 6.84%, and 6.31%. However, ITI Banking & PSU Debt Fund has a lower expense ratio of 0.23%, which may appeal to cost-conscious investors, but its significantly lower AUM of ₹33 Cr could raise concerns about liquidity and stability. Investors should weigh the higher returns of ICICI Prudential against the lower costs of ITI Banking & PSU Debt when making their choice.
ICICI Prudential Banking and PSU Debt Fund - Growth
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Debt · Banking and PSU Debt
ITI Banking & PSU Debt Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
ITI Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Debt · Banking and PSU Debt
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Banki... | ITI Banking & PSU Debt... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹36.67 | ₹14.28 |
| Star Rating | ★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.4% | 0.23% |
| AUM | ₹8,081 Cr | ₹33 Cr |
| 1M Return | +0.51% | +0.3% |
| 3M Return | +0.45% | +0.67% |
| 6M Return | +2.77% | +2.38% |
| 1Y Return | +4.91% | +4.27% |
| 3Y CAGR | +7.1% | +6.84% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.6% | +6.31% |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Rahul Goswami, Chandni Gupta | George Heber Joseph |