HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth appears stronger based on its higher star rating of 5 and significantly better returns over the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year periods, with a 5-year CAGR of 14.75% compared to Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option's lack of available long-term return data and lower star rating of 1. However, while HDFC's expense ratio is slightly higher at 0.75%, it is justified by its superior performance and larger AUM of ₹108546 Cr compared to Nippon India's ₹39 Cr. For investors, the choice between these funds may hinge on the tradeoff between higher performance potential and a marginally higher expense ratio versus lower performance and a lower expense ratio.
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
HDFC Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
Nippon India Nifty 500 Quality 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Nippon India Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
| Metric | HDFC Low Duration Fund... | Nippon India Nifty 500... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹2166.94 | ₹10.26 |
| Star Rating | ★★★★★ | ★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.57% |
| AUM | ₹108,546 Cr | ₹39 Cr |
| 1M Return | -3.33% | +0.22% |
| 3M Return | -3.31% | -7.47% |
| 6M Return | +1.02% | -6.45% |
| 1Y Return | -3.32% | -6.18% |
| 3Y CAGR | +14.53% | — |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.75% | — |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Prashant Jain | Jitendra Tolani |