HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Nippon India Low Duration Fund - Retail Plan - Growth Plan - Growth Option
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth appears stronger based on its metrics, boasting a higher star rating of 5 and significantly better returns over 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years compared to Nippon India Low Duration Fund - Retail Plan - Growth Plan - Growth Option, which has a star rating of 1 and lower returns across the same periods. While HDFC's expense ratio is slightly higher at 0.75% compared to Nippon India's 0.63%, the tradeoff is justified given the superior performance and larger AUM of ₹108546 Cr versus ₹27 Cr. Investors should consider HDFC Low Duration Fund for better returns, while being mindful of the higher expense ratio.
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
HDFC Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
Nippon India Low Duration Fund - Retail Plan - Growth Plan - Growth Option
Nippon India Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
| Metric | HDFC Low Duration Fund... | Nippon India Low Durat... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹2166.94 | ₹10.1 |
| Star Rating | ★★★★★ | ★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.63% |
| AUM | ₹108,546 Cr | ₹27 Cr |
| 1M Return | -3.33% | -4.07% |
| 3M Return | -3.31% | -6.46% |
| 6M Return | +1.02% | -5.45% |
| 1Y Return | -3.32% | -9.49% |
| 3Y CAGR | +14.53% | +6.75% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.75% | +6.05% |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Prashant Jain | Jitendra Tolani |