HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Nippon India Low Duration Fund - Retail Plan - Growth Plan -Bonus Option
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth appears to be the stronger option based on its higher star rating of 5 and significantly better returns, with a 1Y return of -3.32%, a 3Y CAGR of 14.53%, and a 5Y CAGR of 14.75%, compared to Nippon India Low Duration Fund - Retail Plan - Growth Plan -Bonus Option's 1Y return of -7.04%, 3Y CAGR of 6.84%, and 5Y CAGR of 6.09%. While HDFC's expense ratio is slightly higher at 0.75% compared to Nippon India's 0.63%, the tradeoff of potentially higher returns may justify the expense for many investors. For those deciding between these two funds, HDFC Low Duration Fund offers a more robust performance track record, albeit at a slightly higher cost.
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
HDFC Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
Nippon India Low Duration Fund - Retail Plan - Growth Plan -Bonus Option
Nippon India Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
| Metric | HDFC Low Duration Fund... | Nippon India Low Durat... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹2166.94 | ₹10.12 |
| Star Rating | ★★★★★ | ★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.63% |
| AUM | ₹108,546 Cr | ₹27 Cr |
| 1M Return | -3.33% | -3.5% |
| 3M Return | -3.31% | -5.55% |
| 6M Return | +1.02% | -3.36% |
| 1Y Return | -3.32% | -7.04% |
| 3Y CAGR | +14.53% | +6.84% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.75% | +6.09% |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Prashant Jain | Jitendra Tolani |