HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Nippon India Index Fund - Nifty 50 Plan - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth appears stronger based on the metrics provided, boasting a higher star rating of 5 and significantly better returns, with a 3Y CAGR of 14.53% and a 5Y CAGR of 14.75%, compared to Nippon India Index Fund - Nifty 50 Plan - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option's 3Y CAGR of 7.43% and 5Y CAGR of 6.47%. While HDFC has a higher expense ratio at 0.75% versus Nippon India's 0.6%, the tradeoff is justified by HDFC's superior performance and larger AUM of ₹108546 Cr compared to Nippon's ₹1276 Cr. For investors deciding between these two funds, HDFC Low Duration Fund offers a stronger growth potential despite its slightly higher costs.
HDFC Low Duration Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
HDFC Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
Nippon India Index Fund - Nifty 50 Plan - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option
Nippon India Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Flexi Cap
| Metric | HDFC Low Duration Fund... | Nippon India Index Fun... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹2166.94 | ₹8.08 |
| Star Rating | ★★★★★ | ★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.6% |
| AUM | ₹108,546 Cr | ₹1,276 Cr |
| 1M Return | -3.33% | -2.4% |
| 3M Return | -3.31% | -1.51% |
| 6M Return | +1.02% | +0.31% |
| 1Y Return | -3.32% | -3.35% |
| 3Y CAGR | +14.53% | +7.43% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.75% | +6.47% |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Prashant Jain | Himanshu Mange |