Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth vs quant Commodities Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
The quant Commodities Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan appears stronger based on its higher star rating of 4 and significantly better long-term returns, particularly with a 3Y CAGR of 36.11% and a 5Y CAGR of 24.68%. In contrast, the Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth offers lower returns, especially over the longer term, with a 3Y CAGR of 19.49% and a 5Y CAGR of only 6.9%, albeit at a higher expense ratio of 0.31% compared to quant's 0.06%. Investors may find the quant fund's superior performance compelling, but should consider its lower AUM of ₹579 Cr compared to Franklin's ₹715 Cr, which may affect liquidity. Overall, for those prioritizing long-term growth potential, the quant Commodities Fund may be the more appealing option.
Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Sectoral/ Thematic
quant Commodities Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
quant Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Sectoral/ Thematic
| Metric | Franklin Asian Equity ... | quant Commodities Fund... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹45.31 | ₹14.46 |
| Star Rating | ★★ | ★★★★ |
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.06% |
| AUM | ₹715 Cr | ₹579 Cr |
| 1M Return | -9.58% | -1.78% |
| 3M Return | -7.21% | -6.85% |
| 6M Return | -3.52% | -5.06% |
| 1Y Return | +18.09% | +7.6% |
| 3Y CAGR | +19.49% | +36.11% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.9% | +24.68% |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Srikesh Nair, Varun Sharma | C Mehta |