360 ONE QUANT FUND DIRECT INCOME DISTRIBUTION CUM CAPITAL WITHDRAWAL vs Kotak Business Cycle - Direct Plan - Growth
Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.
TopFund Analysis
Kotak Business Cycle - Direct Plan - Growth appears stronger based on the metrics provided, particularly with its higher star rating of 5 and better 1-year and 3-year returns compared to 360 ONE QUANT FUND DIRECT INCOME DISTRIBUTION CUM CAPITAL WITHDRAWAL, which has a 3-star rating and lower returns. However, investors should note that while Kotak has a lower expense ratio of 0.7393%, it also has a significantly higher AUM of ₹3413 Cr, which may indicate more investor confidence. For investors choosing between these two funds, Kotak Business Cycle may offer a more favorable risk-return profile despite its larger size.
360 ONE QUANT FUND DIRECT INCOME DISTRIBUTION CUM CAPITAL WITHDRAWAL
IIFL Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Thematic
Kotak Business Cycle - Direct Plan - Growth
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
★★★★★
Equity · Thematic
| Metric | 360 ONE QUANT FUND DIR... | Kotak Business Cycle -... |
|---|---|---|
| NAV | ₹19.81 | ₹18.71 |
| Star Rating | ★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.7393% |
| AUM | ₹774 Cr | ₹3,413 Cr |
| 1M Return | +3.49% | +3.7% |
| 3M Return | -3.42% | +0.27% |
| 6M Return | -0.63% | +9.23% |
| 1Y Return | -2.71% | +6.73% |
| 3Y CAGR | +14.37% | +17.77% |
| 5Y CAGR | +24.46% | — |
| Risk Level | — | — |
| Fund Manager | Parijat Garg | Pankaj Tibrewal |