How to Evaluate an IPO Before You Apply: A Checklist Beyond GMP
TopFund Team
TopFund
A high grey market premium tells you what other applicants think a stock might list at — it tells you nothing about whether the underlying business is actually worth owning. Here's what to check instead.
Why GMP Alone Isn't Enough
I watch the same thing happen in every hot IPO cycle: someone applies purely because a Telegram group is screaming about a ₹40 GMP, without opening the RHP even once. Grey Market Premium (GMP) is the single most-watched number in Indian IPO investing — and also the most misunderstood. It only reflects what informal grey-market participants currently expect a stock to list at, based on sentiment in an unregulated, over-the-counter network. It says nothing about whether the company behind the IPO is fundamentally sound. A hot GMP can evaporate by listing day; a modest one can sit quietly on top of a genuinely strong business. Here's the checklist I actually use before applying — GMP is one line on it, not the whole thing. (More on this in why high GMP doesn't guarantee listing gains.)
Step 1: Read the Financials in the RHP/DRHP
Every IPO publishes a Red Herring Prospectus (RHP) with 3 years of audited financials. This is the single most important document, and most applicants skip it entirely.
- Revenue growth trend — is revenue growing consistently, or is there a single good year propping up an otherwise flat trend?
- Profit margins — are margins stable or improving, or is the company growing revenue while losing money on each additional rupee of sales?
- Debt levels — a high debt-to-equity ratio going into an IPO is a red flag, especially if the IPO proceeds aren't earmarked to reduce it.
- Related-party transactions — check for significant business dealings with promoter-owned entities, which can obscure the true profitability of the core business.
Step 2: Understand the "Objects of the Issue"
Every RHP discloses exactly what the company plans to do with the money it raises. This one section tells you more about the IPO's real purpose than any grey-market number ever will.
- Stronger signal: funding new capacity, R&D, technology investment, or paying down existing debt to strengthen the balance sheet.
- Weaker signal: the bulk of proceeds going toward an Offer for Sale (OFS) — where existing promoters or early investors are simply cashing out their stake, with little to no fresh capital actually reaching the company itself.
Step 3: Read Subscription Data by Category, Not Just the Headline
"120x subscribed" makes headlines, but the composition matters more than the total.
| Category | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| QIB (Qualified Institutional Buyers) | Institutions typically apply after real due diligence — strong QIB demand is the most credible quality signal |
| NII (Non-Institutional / HNI) | Often leveraged, short-term-oriented money chasing listing gains — a strong NII number alone isn't a fundamentals signal |
| Retail | Frequently driven by GMP hype and social-media sentiment more than financial analysis |
Continue Exploring
A retail-only frenzy with weak QIB participation is a materially different, riskier setup than an IPO where institutions are competing hard for allotment too.
Step 4: Compare Valuation Against Listed Peers
Look up the P/E ratio (or the sector-appropriate multiple — P/B for financials, EV/EBITDA for capital-intensive businesses) the IPO is priced at, and compare it to already-listed peers in the same industry. A premium to peers isn't automatically a red flag — but it needs a genuine growth-rate or margin advantage in the financials to justify it. If the RHP doesn't make that case explicitly, treat the premium as added risk rather than a vote of confidence.
Step 5: Check the Anchor Investor List
Anchor investors — mutual funds, insurance companies, sovereign funds — commit capital a day before the IPO opens, after their own institutional due diligence, and their holdings are locked in for a defined period. A quality anchor book (recognizable domestic mutual fund houses, not just obscure entities) is a meaningfully stronger signal than GMP or retail subscription alone. Check the full Anchor Investor tracker on TopFund before applying.
Putting It Together
GMP tells you what people expect to pay tomorrow. The RHP tells you what you're actually buying. Read both, but weight the second one far more heavily.
Use TopFund's Live IPO tracker to follow GMP trend, subscription by category, and anchor data together for every open IPO, and check historical Listing Gains to see how similarly-hyped IPOs actually performed once the grey-market noise settled.
My Take
A disciplined IPO evaluation checks financials, use of proceeds, QIB subscription, peer valuation, and anchor quality — in that order — with GMP sitting in the background as sentiment, not a scorecard. It takes maybe 15 extra minutes to run through this checklist before you apply. I've never regretted spending those 15 minutes; I have regretted skipping them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a high GMP a good reason to apply for an IPO?
GMP tells you what the grey market currently expects the listing price to be — it's a sentiment signal, not a quality signal. GMP has, historically, sometimes failed to hold by listing day, and it says nothing about whether the underlying business is fundamentally sound or fairly valued. Use it as one input, not the deciding factor.
What should I check first in an IPO's RHP?
Start with revenue growth over the last 3 years, profit margin trend, and debt levels — these tell you whether the business is actually growing profitably or just growing on paper. Then check the 'Objects of the Issue' section, which tells you what the company plans to do with the money raised.
Why does 'use of proceeds' matter so much?
An IPO raising money to fund genuine business expansion (new capacity, R&D, debt reduction to strengthen the balance sheet) is a fundamentally different signal than one raising money mainly to let existing promoters or early investors exit their stake. The RHP's 'Objects of the Issue' section discloses this directly.
Does high subscription mean the IPO is a good investment?
High overall subscription mostly reflects retail demand and can be driven by grey-market hype alone. Strong QIB (Qualified Institutional Buyer) subscription is a more meaningful quality signal, since institutional investors typically apply after their own due diligence on financials and valuation — check the subscription break-up by category, not just the headline number.
How do I compare an IPO's valuation to see if it's fairly priced?
Compare the IPO's P/E ratio (and other relevant multiples for the sector) against listed peers already trading in the same industry. A premium valuation isn't automatically bad, but it needs a clear growth or margin story in the financials to justify it — if the RHP doesn't make that case, the premium is a risk, not a bonus.
Sources
Share this guide