Which has the lower expense ratio, UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan or WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth?

UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan's expense ratio is 1.47% versus WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth's 0.72%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth

Q: UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth — which has given better returns?

UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan has a 1-year return of -0.86% versus WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth's 3.85%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

UTI Children's Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan

UTI Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Hybrid · Balanced Hybrid

WhiteOak Capital Balanced Hybrid Fund Direct Plan Growth

WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Hybrid · Balanced Hybrid

Metric	UTI Children's Hybrid ...	WhiteOak Capital Balan...
NAV	₹41.29	₹13.73
Star Rating	★	★★★
Expense Ratio	1.47%	0.72%
AUM	₹4,388 Cr	₹285 Cr
1M Return	+0.42%	+3.28%
3M Return	+1.35%	+4.6%
6M Return	+0.77%	+1.14%
1Y Return	-0.86%	+3.85%
3Y CAGR	+7.19%	—
5Y CAGR	+7.37%	—
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Amandeep Chopra, Kaushik Basu	Ramesh Mantri

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds