Which has the lower expense ratio, 360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth or JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option?

360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth's expense ratio is 0.34% versus JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option's 0.43%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both 360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth and JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth vs JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option

Q: 360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth vs JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option — which has given better returns?

360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth has a 1-year return of 5.35% versus JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option's 3.46%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

360 ONE Dynamic Bond Fund Direct Plan Growth

360 ONE Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Dynamic Bond

JM Dynamic Bond Fund (Regular) - Growth Option

JM Financial Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Dynamic Bond

Metric	360 ONE Dynamic Bond F...	JM Dynamic Bond Fund (...
NAV	₹25.52	₹46.33
Star Rating	★★★★★	★★★
Expense Ratio	0.34%	0.43%
AUM	₹579 Cr	₹53 Cr
1M Return	+2.13%	+0.54%
3M Return	+1.86%	+1.57%
6M Return	+2.74%	+2.56%
1Y Return	+5.35%	+3.46%
3Y CAGR	+8.03%	+6.88%
5Y CAGR	+7.02%	+6.16%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Ankur Parekh	Shalini Tibrewala

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds