arrow_back Market Intelligence
CEAT’s 22% revenue growth masks margin squeeze; ₹1,205-crore expansion raises the stakes
company · Hindu BusinessLine · 16 Jul 2026

CEAT’s 22% revenue growth masks margin squeeze; ₹1,205-crore expansion raises the stakes

auto_awesome

AI Summary

CEAT reported a strong revenue growth of 22.4% in Q1 FY27, reaching ₹4,318 crore, but faced a significant decline in net profit, down 96.4% to ₹4 crore due to rising raw-material costs and increased finance expenses. The EBITDA margin also contracted to 8.56%, reflecting ongoing challenges in managing costs amidst healthy demand. The company is investing ₹1,205 crore to expand its production capacity, which may help mitigate future margin pressures, but investors should monitor raw-material prices and pricing strategies closely.

CEAT’s Q1 FY27 performance presents a sharp growth-profitability divergence: revenue expanded by more than a fifth, but operating margins contracted and consolidated profit was almost wiped out as raw-material inflation and higher finance costs offset demand gains.

Consolidated revenue from operations rose 22.4 per cent to ₹4,318 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹3,529 crore in Q1 FY26. Net profit, however, plunged 96.4 per cent to ₹4 crore from ₹112 crore during the corresponding period.

“Q1 was a challenging quarter for the industry. The continuing West Asia crisis led to significant raw-material cost inflation, which weighed on our gross and operating margins,” Managing Director and CEO Arnab Banerjee said.

The EBITDA margin contracted 238 basis points to 8.56 per cent in Q1 FY27 from 10.94 per cent in Q1 FY26. This implies EBITDA of about ₹370 crore, down around 4 per cent from ₹386 crore, despite the strong revenue growth.

Raw-material consumption increased 33 per cent to ₹2,978 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹2,239 crore in Q1 FY26, substantially faster than revenue. CEAT implemented cumulative price increases of 5 per cent, but these were insufficient to offset the cost escalation fully.

“We responded with calibrated price increases to partly offset the impact, while staying focused on demand and market share,” Banerjee said. Healthy demand across segments and high capacity utilisation supported the double-digit revenue growth, he added.

Finance costs climbed 78 per cent to ₹146 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹82 crore in Q1 FY26. This included a ₹48-crore foreign-exchange loss at CEAT OHT Lanka following the restatement of an $80-million borrowing from the parent company.

Consequently, consolidated profit before exceptional items and tax fell 75.5 per cent to ₹39 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹159 crore in Q1 FY26.

CEAT’s standalone numbers offer a clearer view of its core operations. Standalone revenue rose 18.2 per cent to ₹4,163 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹3,521 crore in Q1 FY26, while net profit declined 27.4 per cent to ₹98 crore from ₹135 crore. The standalone EBITDA margin narrowed to 9.13 per cent from 11.11 per cent.

CFO Kumar Subbiah cautioned that raw-material costs were likely to remain elevated in Q2 FY27. “We will continue to balance our pricing actions and cost prudence to progressively mitigate the impact on our margins,” he said.

Despite the near-term pressure, CEAT approved an investment of about ₹1,205 crore to add 53,000 two-wheeler tyres a day progressively by FY31. This amounts to a 66 per cent addition over its existing owned capacity of about 80,000 tyres a day, which is operating at nearly 95 per cent utilisation.

The expansion will be financed through internal accruals and debt. For investors, the key variables are further price increases, raw-material costs, Camso’s earnings contribution and the effect of the expansion on leverage and returns.

open_in_new

Original Article

Published on Hindu BusinessLine

open_in_new Read Full Article on Hindu BusinessLine
1