Which has the lower expense ratio, quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option or UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option's expense ratio is 1.1% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 1.28%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option and UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

Q: quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct — which has given better returns?

quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option has a 1-year return of 11.75% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 3.87%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

quant Infrastructure Fund - Growth Option

Quant Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

Metric	quant Infrastructure F...	UTI Infrastructure Fun...
NAV	₹42.19	₹153.37
Star Rating	★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	1.1%	1.28%
AUM	₹3,205 Cr	₹8,549 Cr
1M Return	+5.05%	+5.52%
3M Return	+16.42%	+6.59%
6M Return	+16.71%	+6.18%
1Y Return	+11.75%	+3.87%
3Y CAGR	+21.59%	+22.31%
5Y CAGR	+21.52%	+24.71%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Sanjeev Sharma	S Naren, Ihab Dalwai

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds