Which has the lower expense ratio, Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth's expense ratio is 1.66% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 1.28%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth and UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

Q: Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct — which has given better returns?

Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth has a 1-year return of 11.47% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 3.87%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

Motilal Oswal Infrastructure Fund-Direct-Growth

Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

Metric	Motilal Oswal Infrastr...	UTI Infrastructure Fun...
NAV	₹12.93	₹153.37
Star Rating	★★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	1.66%	1.28%
AUM	₹145 Cr	₹8,549 Cr
1M Return	+2.93%	+5.52%
3M Return	+5.33%	+6.59%
6M Return	+8.21%	+6.18%
1Y Return	+11.47%	+3.87%
3Y CAGR	—	+22.31%
5Y CAGR	—	+24.71%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Ajay Khandelwal	S Naren, Ihab Dalwai

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds