Which has the lower expense ratio, Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth or Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth?

Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth's expense ratio is 0.2% versus Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's 0.9%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth and Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth vs Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Q: Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth vs Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth — which has given better returns?

Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth has a 1-year return of 28.76% versus Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's 2.64%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund Direct Growth

Mirae Asset Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Thematic

Tata Business Cycle Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Tata Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Thematic

Metric	Mirae Asset NYSE FANG ...	Tata Business Cycle Fu...
NAV	₹42.51	₹20.8
Star Rating	★★★★★	★★
Expense Ratio	0.2%	0.9%
AUM	₹85 Cr	₹2,667 Cr
1M Return	-3.54%	+6.19%
3M Return	+9.78%	+8.2%
6M Return	+15.77%	+4.93%
1Y Return	+28.76%	+2.64%
3Y CAGR	+44.42%	+16.54%
5Y CAGR	+28.38%	—
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Ekta Gala	Murthy Nagarajan

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds