Which has the lower expense ratio, LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth's expense ratio is 1.39% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 1.28%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth and UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

Q: LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct — which has given better returns?

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth has a 1-year return of 10.21% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 3.87%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

LIC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

Metric	LIC MF Infrastructure ...	UTI Infrastructure Fun...
NAV	₹63.0	₹153.37
Star Rating	★★★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	1.39%	1.28%
AUM	₹1,137 Cr	₹8,549 Cr
1M Return	+5.53%	+5.52%
3M Return	+11.41%	+6.59%
6M Return	+14.07%	+6.18%
1Y Return	+10.21%	+3.87%
3Y CAGR	+28.21%	+22.31%
5Y CAGR	+25.04%	+24.71%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Sachin Relekar	S Naren, Ihab Dalwai

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds