Which has the lower expense ratio, HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth or HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth?

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth's expense ratio is 0.69% versus HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth's 0.69%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth and HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth vs HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth

Q: HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth vs HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth — which has given better returns?

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth has a 1-year return of 3.56% versus HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth's 3.56%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Direct Growth

HSBC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Medium to Long Duration

HSBC Medium to Long Duration Fund - Regular Growth

HSBC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Debt · Medium to Long Duration

Metric	HSBC Medium to Long Du...	HSBC Medium to Long Du...
NAV	₹48.84	₹43.72
Star Rating	★★★	★★★
Expense Ratio	0.69%	0.69%
AUM	₹49 Cr	₹49 Cr
1M Return	+1.17%	+1.17%
3M Return	+2.06%	+2.06%
6M Return	+2.97%	+2.97%
1Y Return	+3.56%	+3.56%
3Y CAGR	+6.76%	+6.76%
5Y CAGR	+5.66%	+5.66%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Sanjay Shah	Sanjay Shah

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds