Which has the lower expense ratio, HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth or UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth's expense ratio is 1.07% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 1.28%. A lower expense ratio directly improves your net returns over the long term, all else being equal.

Can I invest in both HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth and UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct?

Yes, but check for portfolio overlap first if both funds are in the same category — holding two funds with very similar underlying stocks reduces the diversification benefit of investing in more than one fund.

HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

Q: HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth vs UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct — which has given better returns?

HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth has a 1-year return of 3.8% versus UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct's 3.87%. Compare NAV, expense ratio and star rating above before deciding, and check consistency over 3-5 years rather than a single year.

Side-by-side comparison of NAV, returns, expense ratio and star rating.

HSBC Infrastructure Fund - Direct Growth

HSBC Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

UTI Infrastructure Fund-Growth Option- Direct

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund

★★★★★

Equity · Sectoral

Metric	HSBC Infrastructure Fu...	UTI Infrastructure Fun...
NAV	₹55.68	₹153.37
Star Rating	★★★	★★★★★
Expense Ratio	1.07%	1.28%
AUM	₹2,452 Cr	₹8,549 Cr
1M Return	+3.52%	+5.52%
3M Return	+7.43%	+6.59%
6M Return	+10.54%	+6.18%
1Y Return	+3.8%	+3.87%
3Y CAGR	+19.63%	+22.31%
5Y CAGR	+20.31%	+24.71%
Risk Level	—	—
Fund Manager	Cheenu Gupta	S Naren, Ihab Dalwai

open_in_new View Fund A open_in_new View Fund B

Compare More Funds SIP Calculator SIP vs Lumpsum Guide ELSS Tax Saving Funds